Showing posts with label Trailers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trailers. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Trailers: The Great Gatsby



      
     Just saw the trailer for the new The Great Gatsby adaptation and dear God in Heaven it looks bad! Laughably, mind-numbingly bad. It looks so unspeakably, maniacally misconceived that I hardly know where to begin.
            Well, let’s start with the cast: Leonardo DiCaprio stars as the titular Gatsby, Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway, and Carey Mulligan as Daisy Buchannan.
First of all, who the heck cast Tobey Maguire as Nick? That’s just…wrong. Nick, as the book’s narrator, is the story’s moral center: the one genuinely decent person in Gatsby’s tragic life, and the sensible, observant eye-of-the-storm. Maguire can certainly be likeable, but in a rather dorky, boy-next-door kind of way rather than an intelligent, morally solid kind of way. In what’s supposed to be a roaring-twenties society party, Maguire looks like a time-travelling 90’s teenager who snuck in through the back door (shades of Shia LaBouf in The Greatest Game Ever Played, except that here it’s not intentional). To put it bluntly, they cast an actor who has absolutely no sense of maturity about him as the only mature character in the story. Hearing him say, “who is this ‘Gatsby’?” in his nasally, I-didn’t-quite-make-it-through-puberty voice is enough to make me laugh. 
DiCaprio isn’t as horrendously miscast as Maguire, but from what we see of his performance he’s almost even more of a misfire. For instance, in a conversation with Daisy he looks less like a man talking to the love of his life and more like a man who really needs to eat more fiber, if you get my drift. Frankly, I think he would have been a better choice for Nick, and, I don’t know, someone else could have taken Gatsby.
Mulligan looks incredibly vapid and blank as Daisy, though whether that’s the performance or the character is, admittedly, hard to tell at this point. Still, even Daisy ought to change her expression sometimes
Then there’s the whole look and style of the film, which is bright, artsy, artificial, and nauseatingly self-indulgent. This doesn’t look like the Jazz Age, this looks like a 90’s music video with lasers and weird camera angles.  It’s like the director (Baz Luhrman) wants to remind the audience every second of the film that he is an artist and a bold, visionary director. The result it looks like Las Vegas threw up on Fitzgerald’s novel. The computer-generated 300-style look of the whole thing fits in with Fitzgerald about as well as an extended rap number would fit in with Charles Dickens.
Which brings me to the soundtrack, which is so aggressively non-1920s in style that it makes me wonder if the whole thing was meant as a parody. We get a kind of pseudo-rap type thing in the opening, then a mewling pop ballad for the second half. Each one says “Fitzgerald’s jazz age!” about as much as an iPod.            
The Great Gatsby is a really wonderful book, all about pride, vanity, passion, unworthy love, and genuine friendship. Its overwhelming feelings are of sadness, longing, and despair, with brilliant flashes of genuine human kindness. This latest adaptation, apparently, is all about “look what a brilliant, bold artist Baz Luhrman is!” 

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Trailers: The Amazing Spider-Man



First, the bad:

-It looks way too dark.
            Sure, Spider-Man has a dark side, but constant night scenes, a big ‘there’s a dark secret in your past,’ and a search for Peter’s missing, possibly sinister father? Doesn’t seem to me like that has any place in a Spider-Man movie, especially not one that’s apparently an origin story. It looks to me like they've dialed up the dark way too much.

-I HATE SPIDER-MAN’S NEW VOICE
            Andrew Garfield just sounds like a punk teenager when he ought to sound like a nerd. Toby Maguire wasn’t the perfect Peter/Spider-Man, but his voice was pretty much ideal: a kind of semi-dorky, semi-smart flavor which I don’t get from Garfield.

-“I created him”
            Yeah, I’m gonna have to wait to see how that plays out, but it doesn’t square with my image of either Spider-Man or the Lizard. Besides, is that the only reason Spider-Man has to stop the Lizard? Like, if Connors had just done it himself would he have just said ‘oh well, not my problem?’ which brings me to…

-Evil Curt Connors
            As far as I know, Connors was never evil in the comics, he just turned into the evil Lizard involuntarily. I don’t like the change: I think it robs the character of his bite (no pun intended…okay, pun somewhat intended) and turns him into just a second-rate Green Goblin or something.

-Silent webshooters
            Okay, so they’re going back to the mechanical web-shooters, no big. The trouble is, from the trailer, they sound way too quiet. The web shooters, to my mind, ought to have a very distinct sound to them, sort of signaling “Spider-Man’s here!” these just sort of click. Lame

Now the good:

-The action looks pretty good.
            I liked the brief shots of Spider-Man taking on a whole police force single-handedly, the Lizard beating him up, and so on.

-Quippage is promising.
            At one point a car jacker asks “Are you a cop?” to which Spider-Man responds in disbelief “You seriously think I’m a cop?” That’s good, that’s right, that’s Spider-Man.

-The Lizard looks cool.
            We only see glimpses, of course, but the Lizard has always been a cool bad guy and we’ve been waiting a long time to see him. From what we see, he looks about right.

Verdict:
-I still think they should have just stuck with the Sam Raimi series. Yeah, ‘3’ wasn’t as good as it could’ve been, but it wasn’t franchise-killingly bad. Rebooting it now just seems over indulgent. That said, this looks like it’ll have some good points, but ultimately not feel enough like a real ‘Spider-Man’ movie.  Not really looking forward to this.