Today
the sad news broke that Roger Ebert has died after a long battle with cancer.
Ebert
was my first influence in film criticism. On my days home sick from school I
wasn’t allowed to watch TV, so I often passed the time by reading and rereading
one of the collections of his reviews we had around the house. He provided me
with many invaluable lessons in both thinking and writing about film…and,
honestly, in writing in general.
I
have my problems with Ebert as a critic. He had an unfortunate tendency to
allow politics (he was, naturally, an arch-liberal) and preconceived notions to
dictate his opinion of films. He also raised justifiable incredulity with his
lone film script – for the awful Beyond
the Valley of the Dolls. But at his best, he was one of the wittiest and
most insightful voices in film criticism. For all his flaws, he deserved the
fame and influence he acquired – the likes of which no other critic had ever or
will ever achieve. Certainly as the undisputedly most influential film critic
in the world, we could have done a lot worse.
Looking
back, I think my favorite review of his was his almost lazy dissection of the
1998 Godzilla. I still can quote the
opening line from memory: “Watching Godzilla
at Cannes was like attending a Satanic ritual at St. Peter’s Basillica.” He
then described the film as coming last in the festival “like horses in a
parade, and perhaps for the same reason.” He even displayed typical good humor
over the fact that one of the characters in the movie – the moronic mayor of
New York – was a thinly-veiled caricature of himself. Far from expressing
outrage or offense, he complained that they should have killed ‘him’ off.
One
of the reasons I generally enjoyed his writing is that he typically wasn’t a
snob; he was as willing to award a glowing tribute to a silly adventure film or
special-effects extravaganza as to a pretentious art film.
I
gave up on regularly reading his reviews a long time ago – about the time of
his appalling review of the original Godzilla,
as a matter of fact (which was so inaccurate and negative that it raises
questions about whether he actually watched
the thing) – but I still occasionally drop in to check his assessment of a
particular movie, whether a classic or a new release. Certainly he was a unique
figure in the world of the movies; a star critic. With amateurs such as myself
flooding the internet, it seems clear that we will never look upon his like
again. For good or for ill, he was the giant of his field and he will be
missed.
Requiescat
in Pacem.
No comments:
Post a Comment